Effectiveness of stress control large group psychoeducation for anxiety and depression: Systematic review and meta-analysis

32Citations
Citations of this article
149Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objectives: This review sought to evaluate the effectiveness of the ‘Stress Control’ (SC) large psychoeducational 6-session group programme developed to increase access to treatment for patients with anxiety and depression. Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis (Prospero registration: CRD42020173676). Methods: Pre–post and post-treatment follow-up effect sizes were extracted and synthesized in a random effects meta-analysis, and variations in effect sizes were investigated via moderator analyses. Secondary analyses synthesized between-group effect sizes from controlled studies containing comparator treatments and calculated the average dropout rate. The quality of the meta-analysis was assessed using the GRADE approach. Results: Nineteen studies with pre–post treatment outcomes were included. The average group size was N = 39, and the average dropout rate was 34%. Pooled effect sizes indicated moderate pre–post treatment reductions in anxiety (ES = 0.58; CI 0.41 to 0.75; N = 5597; Z = 7.13; p

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dolan, N., Simmonds-Buckley, M., Kellett, S., Siddell, E., & Delgadillo, J. (2021). Effectiveness of stress control large group psychoeducation for anxiety and depression: Systematic review and meta-analysis. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 60(3), 375–399. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjc.12288

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free