Quantities or Qualities? A Forgotten Debate about Sounds between Ptolemy and Porphyry

1Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In his Commentary on Ptolemy's Harmonics, Porphyry debunks Ptolemy's quantitative theory of pitches by demonstrating that pitches are qualitative attributes of sound. I argue that Porphyry's main concern is to save the phenomenological dimension of sound while preserving the possibility of a quantitative analysis of music. I show how he draws on the Aristotelian tradition to develop a theory of pitches as emergent properties that covary with some underlying quantitative features without being reducible to them. Porphyry offers an original and compelling solution to the classic problem of how to provide a quantitative analysis of a qualitative phenomenon.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Milesi, M. (2023). Quantities or Qualities? A Forgotten Debate about Sounds between Ptolemy and Porphyry. Phronesis, 68(2), 236–267. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685284-bja10068

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free