Transanal Endoscopic Platforms: TAMIS versus Rigid Platforms: Pros and Cons

9Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Transanal endoscopic surgery encompasses the minimally invasive surgical techniques used to operate in the rectum under magnification while maintaining pneumorectum via a resectoscope or port. The view, magnification, and surgical precision afforded by these advanced transanal techniques have resulted in excellent specimen quality and low recurrence rates, especially compared with traditional transanal surgery. For rigid platforms, the surgeon operates through a rigid 4-cm diameter steel proctoscope of varying lengths that is clamped to the operating table with an articulating arm. Transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) is a newer flexible platform using a disposable port which hooks into the anorectal ring to remain in place. The cost-effectiveness and versatility of the TAMIS platform have resulted in its popularity and use in more advanced applications such as transanal total mesorectal excision. Ultimately, the choice of operating platform should be based on surgeon preference, patient characteristics, availability, and cost. The pros and cons of each platform will be discussed in this article.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Devane, L. A., Daly, M. C., & Albert, M. R. (2022). Transanal Endoscopic Platforms: TAMIS versus Rigid Platforms: Pros and Cons. Clinics in Colon and Rectal Surgery, 35(2), 93–98. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1742108

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free