Ruxolitinib in et: Not all mpn are equal

8Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In this issue of Blood, Harrison et al report the results of the first randomized trial comparing ruxolitinib and best available therapy (BAT) in patients with essential thrombocythemia (ET) resistant or intolerant to hydroxycarbamide (HC). The study suggests that ruxolitinib is not superior to current second-line treatments for ET.1

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Finazzi, G. (2017, October 26). Ruxolitinib in et: Not all mpn are equal. Blood. American Society of Hematology. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2017-08-802165

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free