Abstract
In this issue of Blood, Harrison et al report the results of the first randomized trial comparing ruxolitinib and best available therapy (BAT) in patients with essential thrombocythemia (ET) resistant or intolerant to hydroxycarbamide (HC). The study suggests that ruxolitinib is not superior to current second-line treatments for ET.1
Cite
CITATION STYLE
APA
Finazzi, G. (2017, October 26). Ruxolitinib in et: Not all mpn are equal. Blood. American Society of Hematology. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2017-08-802165
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.
Already have an account? Sign in
Sign up for free