The seabots are coming here: Should they be treated as vessels?

22Citations
Citations of this article
27Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Unmanned Marine Vehicles (UMVs), like their aerial cousins Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), are not easily classified under existing legal regimes. Even though unmanned, should these seagoing drones be treated as vessels under the Law of the Sea Convention articles on navigation rights and duties? Are they vessels under the International Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea (COLREGs, 1972)? If so, should they be accorded a manoeuvring priority vis-à-vis other vessels? Are the differences between autonomous UMVs and the increasingly automated manned vessels all that great, such that classification should turn on whether the vessel is manned rather than on how navigation and collision avoidance decisions are made and executed? © 2012 The Royal Institute of Navigation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Allen, C. H. (2012, October). The seabots are coming here: Should they be treated as vessels? Journal of Navigation. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0373463312000197

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free