An elaboration on sample size determination for correlations based on effect sizes and confidence interval width: a guide for researchers

45Citations
Citations of this article
242Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objectives: This paper aims to serve as a useful guide for sample size determination for various correlation analyses that are based on effect sizes and confidence interval width. Materials and Methods: Sample size determinations are calculated for Pearson’s correlation, Spearman’s rank correlation, and Kendall’s Tau-b correlation. Examples of sample size statements and their justification are also included. Results: Using the same effect sizes, there are differences between the sample size determination of the 3 statistical tests. Based on an empirical calculation, a minimum sample size of 149 is usually adequate for performing both parametric and non-parametric correlation analysis to determine at least a moderate to an excellent degree of correlation with acceptable confidence interval width. Conclusions: Determining data assumption(s) is one of the challenges to offering a valid technique to estimate the required sample size for correlation analyses. Sample size tables are provided and these will help researchers to estimate a minimum sample size requirement based on correlation analyses.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bujang, M. A. (2024). An elaboration on sample size determination for correlations based on effect sizes and confidence interval width: a guide for researchers. Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics, 49(2). https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2024.49.e21

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free