Reconstruction of the glenoid using autologous bone-graft and the SMR Axioma TT metal-backed prosthesis

  • Malhas A
  • Granville-Chapman J
  • Robinson P
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

AIMS: We present our experience of using a metal-backed prosthesis and autologous bone graft to treat gross glenoid bone deficiency. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective cohort study of the first 45 shoulder arthroplasties using the SMR Axioma Trabecular Titanium (TT) metal-backed glenoid with autologous bone graft. Between May 2013 and December 2014, 45 shoulder arthroplasties were carried out in 44 patients with a mean age of 64 years (35 to 89). The indications were 23 complex primary arthroplasties, 12 to revise a hemiarthroplasty or resurfacing, five for aseptic loosening of the glenoid, and five for infection. RESULTS: Of the 45 patients, 16 had anatomical shoulder arthroplasties (ASA) and 29 had reverse shoulder arthroplasties (RSA). Postoperatively, 43/45 patients had a CT scan. In 41 of 43 patients (95%), the glenoid peg achieved > 50% integration. In 40 of 43 cases (93%), the graft was fully or partially integrated. There were seven revisions (16%) but only four (9%) required a change of baseplate. Four (25%) of the 16 ASAs were revised for instability or cuff failure. At two-year radiological follow-up, five of the 41 cases (11%) showed some evidence of lucent lines. CONCLUSION: The use of a metal baseplate with a trabecular titanium surface in conjunction with autologous bone graft is a reliable method of addressing glenoid bone defects in primary and revision RSA setting in the short term. ASAs have a higher rate of complications with this technique.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Malhas, A. M., Granville-Chapman, J., Robinson, P. M., Brookes-Fazakerley, S., Walton, M., Monga, P., … Trail, I. (2018). Reconstruction of the glenoid using autologous bone-graft and the SMR Axioma TT metal-backed prosthesis. The Bone & Joint Journal, 100-B(12), 1609–1617. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.100b12.bjj-2018-0494.r1

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free