Exposing weaknesses in interactive planning: The remarkable return of comprehensive policy analysis in the Netherlands

32Citations
Citations of this article
28Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Decision-making on transport infrastructure projects in the Netherlands has been facing a remarkable wind of change in recent years. In the 1990s, academics and practitioners in policy analysis, public policy and planning all claimed that the traditional policy analysis methods were obsolete, yet they have experienced a sudden resurgence since 2000 in the form of OEEI (Overview of Economic Effects of Infrastructure), a refined application of cost-benefit analysis (CBA). This paper delves into why this new version of CBA has become so politically successful despite predictions made to the contrary. In addition, it focuses on whether this resurgence may lead to ‘econocracy’ (conceptual hegemony by economists and their ideologies and methods over other approaches), and, if so, how this can be prevented. © 2003 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

de Jong, M., & Geerlings, H. (2003). Exposing weaknesses in interactive planning: The remarkable return of comprehensive policy analysis in the Netherlands. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 21(4), 281–291. https://doi.org/10.3152/147154603781766149

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free