Influence of Clinical Factors on the Quality of Life in Romanian People with Epilepsy—A Follow-Up Study in Real-Life Clinical Practice

3Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to assess the influence of various clinical factors on the quality of life perception of patients with epilepsy over a follow-up period in current clinical practice. Methods: Thirty-five PWE evaluated via video-electro-encephalography in the Clinical Hospital of Psychiatry and Neurology in Brasov, Romania, were included, and the quality of life was assessed using the Romanian version of the QOLIE-31-P questionnaire. Results: At baseline, the mean age was 40.03 (±14.63) years; the mean duration of epilepsy was 11.46 (±12.90) years; the mean age at the first seizure was 28.57 (±18.72); and the mean duration between evaluations was 23.46 (±7.54) months. The mean (SD) QOLIE-31-P total score at the initial visit (68.54 ±15.89) was lower than the mean (SD) QOLIE-31-P total score at the follow-up (74.15 ± 17.09). Patients with epileptiform activity recorded via video-electro-encephalography, using polytherapy, those with uncontrolled seizures, and those with one or more seizures per month had statistically significantly lower QOLIE-31-P total scores at baseline and follow-up. Multiple linear regression analyses revealed seizure frequency as a significant inverse predictor of quality of life in both evaluations. Conclusions: The QOLIE-31-P total score was improved during the follow-up period, and medical professionals should use instruments to evaluate quality of life and identify patterns while trying to improve the outcomes of patients with epilepsy.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cioriceanu, I. H., Constantin, D. A., Bobescu, E., Marceanu, L. G., & Rogozea, L. (2023). Influence of Clinical Factors on the Quality of Life in Romanian People with Epilepsy—A Follow-Up Study in Real-Life Clinical Practice. Journal of Personalized Medicine, 13(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm13050752

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free