Nietzsche as a critic of genealogical debunking: Making room for naturalism without subversion

16Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This paper argues that Nietzsche is a critic of just the kind of genealogical debunking he is popularly associated with. We begin by showing that interpretations of Nietzsche which see him as engaging in genealogical debunking turn him into an advocate of nihilism, for on his own premises, any truthful genealogical inquiry into our values is going to uncover what most of his contemporaries deem objectionable origins and thus license global genealogical debunking. To escape nihilism and make room for naturalism without indiscriminate subversion, we then argue, Nietzsche targets the way of thinking about values that permits genealogical debunking: far from trying to subvert values simply by uncovering their origins, Nietzsche is actively criticizing genealogical debunking thus understood. Finally, we draw out the consequences of our reading for Nietzsche's positive vision.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Queloz, M., & Cueni, D. (2019, May 1). Nietzsche as a critic of genealogical debunking: Making room for naturalism without subversion. Monist. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/monist/onz010

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free