How Do the Criteria Affect Sustainable Supplier Evaluation?-A Case Study Using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Methods in a Fuzzy Environment

63Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Choosing a battery supplier is a vital decision-making problem, for which it is essential to obtain stable evaluations. For such sustainable supplier evaluation, multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) methods are often used, as their ability to handle uncertain data gives experts more significant opportunities to consider a broader range of cases. However, given the great number of MCDA approaches, it is challenging to find out which approach is the most appropriate. Therefore, this paper presents a sensitivity analysis on evaluating battery suppliers by ARAS, EDAS, MAIRCA, TOPSIS, and VIKOR methods in a fuzzy environment. The provided study presented similar results for the considered MCDA methods confirmed by the WS similarity measure of rankings and the weighted Spearman correlation rw. On the other hand, the sensitivity analysis conducted on the considered methods indicated that the most relevant criteria for this problem are transportation cost, delivery time, and warranty period.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Więckowski, J., Kizielewicz, B., Shekhovtsov, A., & Sałabun, W. (2023). How Do the Criteria Affect Sustainable Supplier Evaluation?-A Case Study Using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Methods in a Fuzzy Environment. Journal of Engineering Management and Systems Engineering, 2(1), 37–52. https://doi.org/10.56578/jemse020102

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free