Erratum: Publication reform to safeguard wildlife from researcher harm (PLoS Biol (2019) 17:4 (e3000193) DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio3000193)

5Citations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In this work [1], the following sentence within the Introduction was stated incorrectly: Although recent revisions to the Guide incorporated consultation with wildlife biologists, a recent assessment considered the consultation to have occurred in a "cursory and broad manner" [6]. The original intent of the statement was to indicate that wildlife biology was not addressed in The Guide to the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals until recently, and that reference to wildlife biology occurred in a cursory and broad manner. The statement should be revised as follows: Although recent revisions to the Guide addressed wildlife biology, a recent assessment considered this to have occurred in a "cursory and broad manner" with no evidence of consultation with wildlife biologists [6].

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Field, K. A., Paquet, P. C., Artelle, K., Proulx, G., Brook, R. K., & Darimont, C. T. (2020, May 18). Erratum: Publication reform to safeguard wildlife from researcher harm (PLoS Biol (2019) 17:4 (e3000193) DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio3000193). PLoS Biology. Public Library of Science. https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PBIO.3000752

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free