What's Wrong with Automated Influence

42Citations
Citations of this article
59Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Automated Influence is the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) to collect, integrate, and analyse people's data in order to deliver targeted interventions that shape their behaviour. We consider three central objections against Automated Influence, focusing on privacy, exploitation, and manipulation, showing in each case how a structural version of that objection has more purchase than its interactional counterpart. By rejecting the interactional focus of AI Ethics in favour of a more structural, political philosophy of AI, we show that the real problem with Automated Influence is the crisis of legitimacy that it precipitates.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Benn, C., & Lazar, S. (2022). What’s Wrong with Automated Influence. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 52(1), 125–148. https://doi.org/10.1017/can.2021.23

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free