Exogenous surfactant may improve oxygenation but not mortality in adult patients with acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome: A meta-analysis of 9 clinical trials

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate whether exogenous surfactant therapy may be useful in adult patients with acute lung injury or acute respiratory distress syndrome, using a meta-analysis of published clinical trials. Design: A comprehensive literature search was performed to identify all randomized clinical trials examining the effects of the treatment of acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome with exogenous surfactant in adults. The primary outcome measurement was mortality 28 or 30 days after randomization. Secondary outcome measurements included a change in the ratio of the partial pressure of arterial oxygen to the fraction of inspired oxygen in the first 24 hours or after 120 hours, the number of ventilation-free days, and any adverse effects. The meta-analysis was performed using the Review Manager 5.0.0 system. Participants: Randomized clinical trials. Intervention: Meta-analysis of 9 trials. Measurements and Main Results: Nine trials involving 2,575 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The analysis showed that treatment with exogenous pulmonary surfactant does not decrease mortality significantly. There was a significant effect of exogenous surfactant treatment on the change in the partial pressure of arterial oxygen/fraction of inspired oxygen ratio in the first 24 hours but this was lost by 120 hours. The duration of ventilation trended lower in surfactant-treated patients but this was not significant. In addition, surfactant-treated patients had a significantly higher risk of adverse effects. Conclusions: An exogenous surfactant may improve oxygenation over the first 24 hours after administration. However, treatment does not improve mortality and oxygenation over <120 hours after administration and results in a high rate of adverse effects. Therefore, the present data suggest that an exogenous surfactant cannot be considered an effective adjunctive therapy in patients with acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome. © 2012 Elsevier Inc.