Correlation of quinolone resistance levels and differences in basal and quinolone-induced expression from three qnrA-containing plasmids

65Citations
Citations of this article
49Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This study investigated the effect of copy number and transcriptional level of the qnrA gene on plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance, and the effect of quinolones on qnrA expression, in three clinical isolates of Klebsiella pneumoniae and the corresponding Escherichia coli transconjugants. The copy number of plasmids containing qnrA was analysed and transcriptional studies were performed on transconjugants grown in the presence or absence of ciprofloxacin or moxifloxacin. None of the three clinical isolates was porin-deficient. One isolate contained a mutation in the quinolone resistance-determining region of the gyrA gene (Ser83Phe), but no gyrA mutations were present in the other two isolates, and no mutations were found in parC. Differences in qnrA copy number were observed in K. pneumoniae, but not in the corresponding E. coli transconjugants, although the qnrA gene was located in plasmids with similar mobility and Southern blot RFLP pattern. Differences in qnrA transcription, both at the basal level and following induction by quinolones, were observed among transconjugants. Expression of the qnrA gene correlated well with the level of quinolone (ciprofloxacin and moxifloxacin) resistance in E. coli transconjugants. These data suggest that the main factor determining the resistance level in the transconjugants analysed was the different levels of qnrA expression. © 2006 European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rodríguez-Martínez, J. M., Velasco, C., Pascual, A., García, I., & Martínez-Martínez, L. (2006). Correlation of quinolone resistance levels and differences in basal and quinolone-induced expression from three qnrA-containing plasmids. Clinical Microbiology and Infection, 12(5), 440–445. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-0691.2006.01389.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free