Are we so sure it’s not architecture?

4Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This essay deals with the question as to whether architecture pre-exists its representations. The tension between architecture and what Marshal McLuhan shows is the dominant framework of Western thought - the pervasiveness of a linear, typographic way of thinking - is explicated, and the position of the architectural book, its avantgarde possibilities and the relation to the new "electric" spaces of information is discussed. The conclusion is drawn that if we are fully to take into account the coolness (in McLuhan’s terms) of architecture, then this requires an overturning of the notion of representation within architectural discourse.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gough, T. (2016). Are we so sure it’s not architecture? Architecture and Culture, 4(1), 9–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/20507828.2015.1089057

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free