Validation of an active shape model-based semi-automated segmentation algorithm for the analysis of thigh muscle and adipose tissue cross-sectional areas

29Citations
Citations of this article
96Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objective: To validate a semi-automated method for thigh muscle and adipose tissue cross-sectional area (CSA) segmentation from MRI. Materials and methods: An active shape model (ASM) was trained using 113 MRI CSAs from the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI) and combined with an active contour model and thresholding-based post-processing steps. This method was applied to 20 other MRIs from the OAI and to baseline and follow-up MRIs from a 12-week lower-limb strengthening or endurance training intervention (n = 35 females). The agreement of semi-automated vs. previous manual segmentation was assessed using the Dice similarity coefficient and Bland-Altman analyses. Longitudinal changes observed in the training intervention were compared between semi-automated and manual segmentations. Results: High agreement was observed between manual and semi-automated segmentations for subcutaneous fat, quadriceps and hamstring CSAs. With strength training, both the semi-automated and manual segmentation method detected a significant reduction in adipose tissue CSA and a significant gain in quadriceps, hamstring and adductor CSAs. With endurance training, a significant reduction in adipose tissue CSAs was observed with both methods. Conclusion: The semi-automated approach showed high agreement with manual segmentation of thigh muscle and adipose tissue CSAs and showed longitudinal training effects similar to that observed using manual segmentation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kemnitz, J., Eckstein, F., Culvenor, A. G., Ruhdorfer, A., Dannhauer, T., Ring-Dimitriou, S., … Wirth, W. (2017). Validation of an active shape model-based semi-automated segmentation algorithm for the analysis of thigh muscle and adipose tissue cross-sectional areas. Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine, 30(5), 489–503. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10334-017-0622-3

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free