Abstract
The gold standard of peripheral nerve repair is nerve autograft when tensionless repair is not possible. Use of nerve autograft has several shortcomings, however. These include limited availability of donor tissue, sacrifice of a functional nerve, and possible neuroma formation. In order to address these deficiencies, researchers have developed a variety of biomaterials available for repair of peripheral nerve gaps. We review the clinical studies published in the English literature detailing outcomes and reconstructive options. Regardless of the material used or the type of nerve repaired, outcomes are generally similar to nerve autograft in gaps less than 3 cm. New biomaterials currently under preclinical evaluation may provide improvements in outcomes.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Gerth, D. J. (2015). Clinical outcomes for Conduits and Scaffolds in peripheral nerve repair. World Journal of Clinical Cases, 3(2), 141. https://doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v3.i2.141
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.