Contamination susceptibility of three needleless and one standard needle injection systems

1Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Purpose: To compare in vitro the contamination susceptibility of three needleless and one standard needle injection systems. Methods: The Baxter InterLink, St. Paul Medical Key-Lok, Braun SafSite, and Becton Dickinson heparin lock, were compared. Fifty of each were studied. Each system was connected to a culture bottle and injected 30 times over 72 hr. The manufacturers' directions were followed except for Braun's, which recommend that a new sterile cap be used after each injection. Instead, the same cap was used after each injection to reflect day-to-day clinical practice. Culture bottles were subsequently analyzed for bacterial growth. Results: The contamination rates for the heparin lock, InterLink, Key-Lok, and SafSite were 3/50 (6%), 6/50 (12%), 4/50 (8%), and 36/50 (72%), respectively. All positive cultures grew coagulase-negative staphylococcus species. There was no difference in contamination rates between the InterLink, Key-Lok, and heparin lock designs. The contamination rate of the SafSite was higher (P < 0.001) than the other three systems. Conclusions: The InterLink and Key-Lok systems had a similarly low contamination susceptibility as a standard needle injection system. It was not clear if the high contamination rate found with the SafSite System was due to non-adherence to the manufacturer's directions for handling.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ho, A. M. H., & Ling, E. (1999). Contamination susceptibility of three needleless and one standard needle injection systems. Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia, 46(3), 290–293. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03012613

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free