How sympathetic are your spinal cord circuits?

17Citations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Sympathetic control of end organs relies on the activity of sympathetic preganglionic neurones (SPNs) within the spinal cord. These SPNs exhibit heterogeneity with respect to function, neurochemistry, location, descending inputs and patterns of activity. Part of this heterogeneity is bestowed by local spinal circuitry. Our understanding of the role of these local circuits, including the significance of connections between the SPNs themselves through specialized gap junctions, is patchy. This report focuses on interneurones and gap junctions within these circuits. Gap junctions play a role in sympathetic control; they are located on SPNs in the intermediolateral cell column. Mefloquine, a chemical that blocks these gap junctions, reduces local rhythmic activity in the spinal cord slice and disrupts autonomic control in the working heart-brainstem preparation. The role that these gap junctions may play in health and disease in adult animals remains to be elucidated fully. Presympathetic interneurones are located in laminae V, VII and X and the intermediolateral cell column; those in lamina X are GABAergic and directly inhibit SPNs. The GABAergic inputs onto SPNs exert their effects through activation of synaptic and extrasynaptic receptors, which stabilize the membrane at negative potentials. The GABAergic interneurones contribute to rhythmic patterns of activity that can be generated in the spinal cord, because bicuculline reduces network oscillatory activity. These studies indicate that local spinal cord circuitry is critical in enabling appropriate levels and patterning of activity in sympathetic outflow. We need to understand how these circuits may be harnessed in the situation of spinal cord injury.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Deuchars, S. A. (2015). How sympathetic are your spinal cord circuits? Experimental Physiology, 100(4), 365–371. https://doi.org/10.1113/EP085031

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free