The 2005 Outburst of the Halo Black Hole X‐Ray Transient XTE J1118+480

  • Zurita C
  • Torres M
  • Steeghs D
  • et al.
34Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We present optical and infrared monitoring of the 2005 outburst of thehalo black hole X-ray transient XTE J1118+480. We measured a totaloutburst amplitude of ~5.7+/-0.1 mag in the R band and ~5 mag in theinfrared J, H, and K_{s} bands. The hardness ratio HR2 (5-12keV:3-5 keV) from the RXTE ASM data is 1.53+/-0.02 at the peak of theoutburst, indicating a hard spectrum. Both the shape of the light curveand the ratio L_{X}(1-10 keV)/L_{opt} resemble theminioutbursts observed in GRO J0422+32 and XTE J1859+226. During earlydecline, we find a 0.02 mag amplitude variation consistent with asuperhump modulation, like the one observed during the 2000 outburst.Similarly, XTE J1118+480 displayed a double-humped ellipsoidalmodulation distorted by a superhump wave when settled into anear-quiescence level, suggesting that the disk expanded to the 3:1resonance radius after outburst, where it remained until earlyquiescence. The system reached quiescence at R=19.02+/-0.03, about 3months after the onset of the outburst. The optical rise preceded theX-ray rise by at most 4 days. The spectral energy distributions (SEDs)at the different epochs during outburst are all quasi-power laws withF_{nu}~{ν}^{alpha} increasing toward the blue. Atthe peak of the outburst, we derived {α}=0.49+/-0.04 for the opticaldata alone and {α}=0.1+/-0.1 when fitting solely the infrared. Thisdifference between the optical and the infrared SEDs suggests that theinfrared is dominated by a different component (a jet?), whereas theoptical is presumably showing the disk evolution.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zurita, C., Torres, M. A. P., Steeghs, D., Rodriguez‐Gil, P., Munoz‐Darias, T., Casares, J., … Skrutskie, M. (2006). The 2005 Outburst of the Halo Black Hole X‐Ray Transient XTE J1118+480. The Astrophysical Journal, 644(1), 432–438. https://doi.org/10.1086/503286

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free