Comparison of in vitro and in vivo acoustic response of a novel 50:50 PLGA contrast agent

73Citations
Citations of this article
49Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

A comparison between in vitro and in vivo experiments conducted to investigate the acoustic properties of a novel, 1.2 μm diameter poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (50:50) (PLGA) ultrasound contrast agent, the development of which was described previously by us, is presented. A pulse-echo setup was used to determine enhancement in vitro. Additional in vitro studies further characterized the hollow microcapsules, including resonance frequency from attenuation measurements (from 2.25 to 15 MHz) and temperature effects (25 °C vs. 37 °C). In vivo, four rabbits received intravenous injections of the agent (dose range: 0.005-0.13 ml/kg). Quantitative in vivo dose-responses were calculated off-line using spectral power analysis of audio Doppler signals acquired from a custom-made 10 MHz cuff transducer placed around the surgically exposed distal aorta. This frequency was chosen since the very shallow scanning depths encountered in rabbits, in particular for the cuff transducer placed directly around the vessel, necessitates the use of high frequency imaging devices with sufficient spatial resolution to enable meaningful measurements. For qualitative assessments, two rabbits were imaged pre- and post-contrast administration (dose: 0.1 ml/kg) in power Doppler mode. Significant acoustic enhancements (up to 24 dB) were reported both in vitro and in vivo. Moreover, the rabbits did not show any adverse side effects from multiple injections (>20) of the agent. Measured in vitro resonance frequency between 3.09 and 3.49 MHz was lower than predicted for a similar sized free bubble, potentially due to capsule wall structure. Minimal loss of signal (∼4 dB) was observed at 25 °C over 20 min of insonation at 5 MHz but at 37 °C the signal dropped close to base line within the first 5 min. This temperature sensitivity could be due to loss of capsule integrity (and hence loss of gas). Potential causes include increased hydrolysis or polymer softening and increased water uptake by the shell at temperatures closer to the glass transition temperature (Tg). © 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wheatley, M. A., Forsberg, F., Oum, K., Ro, R., & El-Sherif, D. (2006). Comparison of in vitro and in vivo acoustic response of a novel 50:50 PLGA contrast agent. Ultrasonics, 44(4), 360–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultras.2006.04.003

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free