The empirical power of rare variant association methods: Results from sanger sequencing in 1,998 individuals

96Citations
Citations of this article
208Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The role of rare genetic variation in the etiology of complex disease remains unclear. However, the development of next-generation sequencing technologies offers the experimental opportunity to address this question. Several novel statistical methodologies have been recently proposed to assess the contribution of rare variation to complex disease etiology. Nevertheless, no empirical estimates comparing their relative power are available. We therefore assessed the parameters that influence their statistical power in 1,998 individuals Sanger-sequenced at seven genes by modeling different distributions of effect, proportions of causal variants, and direction of the associations (deleterious, protective, or both) in simulated continuous trait and case/control phenotypes. Our results demonstrate that the power of recently proposed statistical methods depend strongly on the underlying hypotheses concerning the relationship of phenotypes with each of these three factors. No method demonstrates consistently acceptable power despite this large sample size, and the performance of each method depends upon the underlying assumption of the relationship between rare variants and complex traits. Sensitivity analyses are therefore recommended to compare the stability of the results arising from different methods, and promising results should be replicated using the same method in an independent sample. These findings provide guidance in the analysis and interpretation of the role of rare base-pair variation in the etiology of complex traits and diseases. © 2012 Ladouceur et al.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ladouceur, M., Dastani, Z., Aulchenko, Y. S., Greenwood, C. M. T., & Richards, J. B. (2012). The empirical power of rare variant association methods: Results from sanger sequencing in 1,998 individuals. PLoS Genetics, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1002496

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free