Abstract
The mechanism of topographic mapping of retinal ganglion cells to the midbrain was previously elucidated by the servomechanism model, which is based on the fact that cells expressing Eph-receptors respond specifically to surface expressing membrane-bound ephrin-ligands at a critical level. The retina has increased nasal-to-temporal gradient of Eph receptor-density and the optic tectum/superior colliculus has increased rostral-to-caudal gradient of membrane-bound ephrin-ligand. An axon from the retina has an identification tag of a certain level of Eph-receptor density depending on its retinal position, and adheres to the site on the tectum/superior colliculus expressing ephrin-ligands at a critical ligand-density level. The servomechanism model rigidly defines positions of axon terminals on the midbrain. However, optic nerve regeneration experiments combined with halved retina or tectum show a plastic or flexible mapping (expansion, compression and transposition of tectal projections). To reconcile the discrepancy between the rigid model and the plastic behavior, competition between retinal axon terminals for a target site was introduced to the servomechanism. The servomechanism/competition model succeeded in computer simulations of the plastic mapping of retinal axons on the tectum. Recent experiments of upregulated ligand-density on the tectum during nerve regeneration and the role of axonal competition are discussed.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Honda, H. (2004). Competitive interactions between retinal ganglion axons for tectal targets explain plasticity of retinotectal projection in the servomechanism model of retinotectal mapping. Development Growth and Differentiation, 46(5), 425–437. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-169x.2004.00759.x
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.