Collaborating with care: creating spaces for authentic reflective practice in academia

3Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Reflection is a valued pedagogical tool in academia. Research shows it is more effective when enacted collectively rather than individually. In this article, we offer fictional autoethnographic vignettes to paint an experiential picture of the daily tensions of being a reflective educator in an Australian university context. Through critically reflecting on our collaborative practices and the vignettes we produced, as well as engagement with the academic literature on reflective teaching practices, we argue that authentic, robust, and safe collaborative reflection relies upon six key qualities. These are (1) non-hierarchical, (2) non-evaluative, (3) flexible and informal, (4) unhurried and iterative, (5) welcoming of the complex emotionality, vulnerability, and discomforts of teaching experiences and, (6) able to explore and acknowledge the wider structural forces and constraints impacting teaching. To conclude, we acknowledge that this type of collaborative reflection is challenging in fast-paced, performance-driven, hierarchical, competitive, and metrified university structures. Leadership, therefore, needs to instantiate new norms in which robust collaborative reflection becomes commonplace.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Trundle, C., Gill, J., Gupta, S., Marcucci, J., & Petridis, L. (2025). Collaborating with care: creating spaces for authentic reflective practice in academia. Higher Education Research and Development, 44(7), 1819–1833. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2025.2488857

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free