Factors associated with reintubation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

13Citations
Citations of this article
59Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: Acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) increase morbidity, mortality, and health care costs in COPD patients. Patients who require mechanical ventilation and fail extubation often have longer hospital stays and/or increased mortality. Determining predictors to identify patients who might require reintubation could help respiratory care teams manage these patients better. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed data of COPD patients over a 3-year period. Inclusion criteria were patients with acute exacerbations of COPD, age more than 45 years, and patients on mechanical ventilation. Exclusion criteria were ventilated via tracheostomy, unplanned extubation, and reintubation for reasons other than respiratory failure. Results: This study included 88 patients; 61 patients were successfully extubated, 11 patients were extubated and required reintubation, and 16 patients were not extubated during their intensive care unit stay. There were no differences in demographic or clinical characteristics between the patients with successful extubation and failed extubation. Patients with successful extubation were more likely to have a "good cough" assessment and to not receive any sedatives or analgesics in the 24 hours prior to extubation than patients who failed extubation (P < .001). Conclusion: Sedative and analgesic drug use prior to extubation was associated with more frequent reintubation in patients with acute exacerbations of COPD. This study suggests that the judicious withdrawal of sedatives prior to extubation may reduce reintubations.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nantsupawat, N., Nantsupawat, T., Limsuwat, C., Sutamtewagul, G., & Nugent, K. (2015). Factors associated with reintubation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Quality Management in Health Care, 24(4), 200–206. https://doi.org/10.1097/QMH.0000000000000069

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free