Trauma Registry: Trauma Quality indicators analysis in hospitalized patients

0Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Purpose: to consolidate a Trauma Register (TR) trough REDCap data acquisition platform and to validate, in this context, local Quality Indicators (QI) as improvement opportunities in trauma management. Methods: continuous data acquisition of all patients admitted in Irmandade da Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo adult Trauma bay and it’s validation in REDCap platform; 6 months retrospective cohort of QI impact in length of hospitalar stay, complications and mortality. Fisher, Chi-squared, Wilcoxon and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to correlate QIs fails with the endpoints, considering p<0.05 and CI <95% as statically significant. Results: 465 were admitted in Trauma bay, with 137 patients hospitalized (29.5%); the number of QIs compromised were related with more complications (p=0.075) and increased length of stay (p=0.028), especially the delay in open fracture’s surgical management, which increased the severe complications’ incidence (p=0.005). Conclusion: the REDCap data acquisition platform is useful as a tool for multi center TR implementation, from ethical and logistical point of view; nevertheless, the proposed QIs are validated as attention points in trauma management, allowing improvements in traumatized patients treatment.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pivetta, L. G. A., Antunes, P. de S. L., Shimoda, G. M., Parreira, J. G., Perlingeiro, J. A. G., & Assef, J. C. (2024). Trauma Registry: Trauma Quality indicators analysis in hospitalized patients. Revista Do Colegio Brasileiro de Cirurgioes, 51. https://doi.org/10.1590/0100-6991e-20243604-en

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free