Pathologist interobserver variability in diagnosing acute ascending intrauterine infection

2Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The histologic diagnosis of acute ascending intrauterine infection permits a higher-efficacy identification of both subclinical infection and clinical chorioamnionitis, but procedures for placental pathology need to adopt a unified approach and work toward reproducible grading and staging systems. We conducted a retrospective chart review of 696 placental records from single and multiple deliveries between January 2011 and February 2020. Then, we compared original diagnoses with diagnoses based on Redline criteria, which is an internationally recognized system of staging and grading. Of the 696 cases available for review, 255 had complete medical records. Findings showed a strong degree of agreement (90%–100%) between original investigators' histological diagnoses of acute ascending intrauterine infection and a review by researchers using Redline criteria. Although interobserver agreement was good, more education is needed on Redline criteria to avoid missed cases (primarily Stage 1), support protocols for pathologists and obstetricians/gynecologists in determining which cases need to be investigated, and the development of reporting standards for acute ascending intrauterine infection and feedback mechanisms during follow-up.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Aljerian, K. (2022). Pathologist interobserver variability in diagnosing acute ascending intrauterine infection. Annals of Diagnostic Pathology, 56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2021.151874

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free