A comparison of two retrospective measures of weekly alcohol consumption: Diary and quantity/frequency index

53Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

There is currently uncertainty regarding the relative performance of a retrospective diary (RD) and a quantity-frequency index (QFI) measure of weekly alcohol consumption. While some previous studies have found more consumption reported on an RD than a QFI, others have found the reverse. As yet, however, no study has compared computerized versions of these two measures. This cross-sectional study involved administration of a computerized survey in a community-based drug and alcohol treatment setting. Five hundred and eighty-six clients (420 males) attending counselling for a range of drug- and alcohol-related issues agreed to participate in the study. The major finding was that more alcohol consumption was reported on the RD, than on the QFI. Similarly, the RD detected a greater proportion of both heavy and high-risk drinkers than the QFI. It is argued that the RD may be preferable to the QFI as a measure of weekly alcohol consumption, for use in community-based treatment settings.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Shakeshaft, A. P., Bowman, J. A., & Sanson-Fisher, R. W. (1999). A comparison of two retrospective measures of weekly alcohol consumption: Diary and quantity/frequency index. Alcohol and Alcoholism, 34(4), 636–645. https://doi.org/10.1093/alcalc/34.4.636

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free