Comparative Analysis of Predictive Algorithms for Performance Measurement

6Citations
Citations of this article
54Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Predictive algorithms, also known as mathematical models, utilize historical data to accurately predict future outcomes. These algorithms identify patterns and relationships within the data, resulting in precise predictions. The growing importance of predictive algorithms in various domains, such as finance, healthcare, marketing, weather forecasting, E-commerce, etc., has led to an increasing need for robust and accurate models. Machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) algorithms, including supervised, unsupervised, & reinforcement learning, play a crucial role in prediction. Supervised algorithms include classification and regression, while unsupervised algorithms primarily focus on clustering. In this study, a detailed comparative analysis of eight classification algorithms, six regression algorithms, and five clustering algorithms is performed using diverse datasets and performance metrics. ROBERTA, ResNet, Random Forest Regression, and K-means clustering algorithms outperformed traditional algorithms in textual classification, image classification, regression, and clustering. This study enables data scientists and practitioners to make informed decisions when selecting appropriate models for their specific applications.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gupta, S., Kishan, B., & Gulia, P. (2024). Comparative Analysis of Predictive Algorithms for Performance Measurement. IEEE Access, 12, 33949–33958. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3372082

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free