Welcome, its suppression, and the in-between spaces of refugee sub-citizenship – Commentary to Gill

12Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This article argues that geographies of welcome complicate simple binary oppositions between fully enfranchised citizenship and what is often theorized as the ‘bare life’ of refugee rejection in ‘spaces of exception’. Ranging from sanctuary cities and squats to clinics, classrooms, kitchens and gardens, spaces of welcome instead offer islands of limited enfranchisement, agency and hope amidst seas of sub-citizenship, subjugation and fear. The concept of sub-citizenship can be used thus to elucidate how welcome and its suppression create a spectrum of intermediate experiences between the abstract poles of biopolitical belonging and necropolitical rejection. Geographies of welcome thereby become legible as in-between spaces in which the damage done by the suppression of welcome is contested and countered, however incompletely.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sparke, M. (2018). Welcome, its suppression, and the in-between spaces of refugee sub-citizenship – Commentary to Gill. Fennia, 196(2), 215–219. https://doi.org/10.11143/fennia.70999

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free