Inter-population mating success in Australian dengue vector mosquitoes: Effects of laboratory colonization and implications for the spread of transgenics

4Citations
Citations of this article
51Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Variability between Aedes aegypti populations in north Queensland, Australia, has the potential to impact the successful implementation of new population replacement mosquito releases for dengue control. Four Ae. aegypti colonies originating from different locations (Cairns, Mareeba, Innisfail, and Charters Towers), along with one F1 field-derived population from Cairns, were inter-crossed to determine any incompatibilities in copulation, insemination, and production of viable offspring. Greater copulation and insemination rates were observed when males recently introduced from the wild ('Cairns-Wild' population) were mated with long-term laboratory females. Egg viability rates for all crosses ranged from 90.2-98.2%, with no significant differences observed between crosses. Greater egg production was seen in some populations, and when corrected for wing-length, egg production was greatest in a Mareeba x Innisfail cross (19.55 eggs/mm wing length) and lowest for the Charters Towers intra-population cross (14.35 eggs/mm). Additionally, behavioral differences were observed between laboratory and wild mosquitoes from the Cairns location, suggesting possible laboratory conditioning. Finally, despite controlled larval rearing conditions, size differences between populations existed with Charters Towers mosquitoes consistently smaller than the other populations. The spread of genes or bacterial symbionts between these populations is unlikely to be hindered by pre-existing reproductive barriers. © 2013 The Society for Vector Ecology.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Richardson, A. J., & Williams, C. R. (2013). Inter-population mating success in Australian dengue vector mosquitoes: Effects of laboratory colonization and implications for the spread of transgenics. Journal of Vector Ecology, 38(1), 111–119. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1948-7134.2013.12016.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free