Risks from Language Models for Automated Mental Healthcare: Ethics and Structure for Implementation

ArXiv: 2406.11852
9Citations
Citations of this article
45Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In the United States and other countries exists a “national mental health crisis”: Rates of suicide, depression, anxiety, substance use, and more continue to increase - exacerbated by isolation, the COVID pandemic, and, most importantly, lack of access to mental healthcare. Therefore, many are looking to AI-enabled digital mental health tools, which have the potential to reach many patients who would otherwise remain on wait lists or without care. The main drive behind these new tools is the focus on large language models that could enable real-time, personalized support and advice for patients. With a trend towards language models entering the mental healthcare delivery apparatus, questions arise about how a robust, high-level framework to guide ethical implementations would look like and whether existing language models are ready for this high-stakes application where individual failures can lead to dire consequences.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Grabb, D., Lamparth, M., & Vasan, N. (2024). Risks from Language Models for Automated Mental Healthcare: Ethics and Structure for Implementation. In Proceedings of the 7th AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society, AIES 2024 (p. 519). AAAI Press.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free