Coalition Priorité Cancer and the pharmaceutical industry in Quebec: Conflicts of interest in the reimbursement of expensive cancer drugs?

11Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In the context of scarce public resources, patient interest groups have increasingly turned to private organizations for financing, including the pharmaceutical industry. This practice puts advocacy groups in a situation of potential conflicts between the interests of patients and those of the drug companies. The interests of patients and industry can converge on issues related to the approval and reimbursement of medications. But even on this issue, interests do not always align perfectly. Using the Quebec example of Coalition Priorité Cancer (CPC) as a case study, we examine the ethical issues raised by such financial relationships in the context of drug reimbursement decision-making. We collected, compiled and analyzed publicly available information on the CPC's organization and activities; this approach allowed us to raise and discuss important questions regarding the possible influence exerted on patient groups by donors. We conclude with some recommendations.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hughes, D., & Williams, B. (2013). Coalition Priorité Cancer and the pharmaceutical industry in Quebec: Conflicts of interest in the reimbursement of expensive cancer drugs? Healthcare Policy, 9(1), 52–64. https://doi.org/10.12927/hcpol.2013.23466

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free