Liquid separation: Three fundamental dimensions within liquidfeedback and other voting technologies

10Citations
Citations of this article
180Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to capitalize on the experiences of LiquidFeedback, providing insights that can be helpful for future developers of voting technologies. The condition of LiquidFeedback as a digital platform carries dramatic implications in terms of its ability to perceive, secure, and make effective the political expression of the community. Beyond the hype, can the LiquidFeedback platform accurately perceive the political will of participants? As a voting technology, is it socially located in a position from where it can meaningfully change the state of affairs of society? Is it configured so that it guarantees fairness and safety from both public and private perspectives? As a result of the conjunction of interviews and critical analysis, three fundamental dimensions to all voting technologies are proposed: Expressivity, Influence, and Integrity.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mendoza, N. (2015). Liquid separation: Three fundamental dimensions within liquidfeedback and other voting technologies. EJournal of EDemocracy and Open Government, 7(2), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.29379/jedem.v7i2.408

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free