COMPARISON OF NUMERICAL METHODS FOR TERNARY FLUID FLOWS: IMMERSED BOUNDARY, LEVEL-SET, AND PHASE-FIELD METHODS

  • LEE S
  • JEONG D
  • CHOI Y
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This paper reviews and compares three different methods for modeling incom-pressible and immiscible ternary fluid flows: the immersed boundary, level set, and phase-field methods. The immersed boundary method represents the moving interface by tracking the La-grangian particles. In the level set method, an interface is defined implicitly by using the signed distance function, and its evolution is governed by a transport equation. In the phase-field method, the advective Cahn–Hilliard equation is used as the evolution equation, and its order parameter also implicitly defines an interface. Each method has its merits and demerits. We perform the several simulations under different conditions to examine the merits and demerits of each method. Based on the results, we determine the most suitable method depending on the specific modeling needs of different situations.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

LEE, S., JEONG, D., CHOI, Y., & KIM, J. (2016). COMPARISON OF NUMERICAL METHODS FOR TERNARY FLUID FLOWS: IMMERSED BOUNDARY, LEVEL-SET, AND PHASE-FIELD METHODS. Journal of the Korea Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 20(1), 83–106. https://doi.org/10.12941/jksiam.2016.20.083

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free