Preinfarction angina prior to first myocardial infarction does not influence long-term prognosis: A retrospective study with subgroup analysis in elderly and diabetic patients

7Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background and hypothesis: Although prodromal angina occurring shortly before an acute myocardial infarction (MI) has protective effects against in-hospital complications, this effect has not been well documented after initial hospitalization, especially in older or diabetic patients. We examined whether angina 1 week before a first MI provides protection in these patients. Methods: A total of 290 consecutive patients, 143 elderly (>64 years of age) and 147 adults (<65 years of age), 68 of whom were diabetic (23.4%) and 222 nondiabetic (76.6%), were examined to assess the effect of preceding angina on long-term prognosis (56 months) after initial hospitalization for a first MI. Results: No significant differences were found in long-term complications after initial hospitalization in these adult and elderly patients according to whether or not they had prodromal angina (44.4% with angina vs 45.4% without in adults; 45.5% vs 58% in elderly, P<0.2). Nor were differences found according to their diabetic status (61.5% with angina vs 72.7% without in diabetics; 37.3% vs 38.3% in nondiabetics; P = 0.4). Conclusion: The occurrence of angina 1 week before a first MI does not confer long-term protection against cardiovascular complications after initial hospitalization in adult or elderly patients, whether or not they have diabetes. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jiménez-Navarro, M. F., Muñoz-García, A., Ramirez-Marrero, M. A., Dominguez-Franco, A., Alcántara, A. G., Gómez-Doblas, J. J., … De Teresa, E. (2009). Preinfarction angina prior to first myocardial infarction does not influence long-term prognosis: A retrospective study with subgroup analysis in elderly and diabetic patients. Clinical Cardiology, 32(9), E61–E64. https://doi.org/10.1002/clc.20513

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free