Whole-body MRI versus18F-FDG PET/CT for pretherapeutic assessment and staging of lymphoma: A meta-analysis

30Citations
Citations of this article
37Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Purpose:18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18 F-FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) is the reference standard in staging of18F-FDG-avid lymphomas; however, there is no recommended functional imaging modality for indolent lymphomas. Therefore, we aimed to compare the performance of whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WB-MRI) with that of18F-FDG PET/CT for lesion detection and initial staging in patients with aggressive or indolent lymphoma. Materials and methods: We searched the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL databases for studies that compared WB-MRI with18F-FDG PET/CT for lymphoma staging or lesion detection. The methodological quality of the studies was assessed using version 2 of the “Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies” tool. The pooled staging accuracy (μ) of WB-MRI and18F-FDG PET/CT for initial staging and for assessing possible heterogeneity (χ2) across studies were calculated using commercially available software. Results: Eight studies comprising 338 patients were included. In terms of staging, the meta-analytic staging accuracies of WB-MRI and18F-FDG PET/CT for Hodgkin lymphoma and aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) were 98% (95% CI, 94%–100%) and 98% (95% CI, 94%–100%), respectively. The pooled staging accuracy of18F-FDG PET/CT dropped to 87% (95% CI, 72%–97%) for staging in patients with indolent lymphoma, whereas that of WB-MRI remained 96% (95% CI, 91%–100%). Subgroup analysis indicated an even lower staging accuracy of18F-FDG PET/CT for staging of less FDG-avid indolent NHLs (60%; 95% CI, 23%–92%), in contrast to the superior performance of WB-MRI (98%; 95% CI, 88%–100%). Conclusion: WB-MRI is a promising radiation-free imaging technique that may serve as a viable alternative to18F-FDG PET/CT for staging of18FDG-avid lymphomas, where18F-FDG PET/CT remains the standard of care. Additionally, WB-MRI seems a less histology-dependent functional imaging test than18F-FDG PET/CT and may be the imaging test of choice for staging of indolent NHLs with low18F-FDG avidity.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wang, D., Huo, Y., Chen, S., Wang, H., Ding, Y., Zhu, X., & Ma, C. (2018). Whole-body MRI versus18F-FDG PET/CT for pretherapeutic assessment and staging of lymphoma: A meta-analysis. OncoTargets and Therapy, 11, 3597–3608. https://doi.org/10.2147/OTT.S148189

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free