Improving Conversations With COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitant Patients: Action Research to Support Family Physicians

6Citations
Citations of this article
32Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Vaccination delivery and efforts to counter vaccine hesitancy have become focal issues for family medicine teams as the COVID-19 pandemic has evolved. Conducting action research, our team developed an interactive web-based guide to improve clinical conversations around a broad range of vaccine hesitancies presented by patients. The paper presents a step-by-step account of the guide being codesigned with family physicians—its targeted end users—in a process that included validation interviews; role-play interviews; and user-tested design. The validation interviews sought to understand the pragmatic realities of vaccine hesitancy in family medicine clinical practice relative to relevant psychological theories. The role-play interviews drew out conversational strategies and advice from family physicians. The principles of motivational interviewing—an evidence-based approach to vaccine hesitancy conversations that supplements information deficit approaches—were used to codesign the content and lay-out of the guide. User counts, stakeholder engagement, and web-based analytics indicate the guide is being used extensively. Formal evaluation of the guide is presently underway.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Leslie, M., Pinto, N., & Fadaak, R. (2022). Improving Conversations With COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitant Patients: Action Research to Support Family Physicians. Annals of Family Medicine, 20(4), 368–373. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.2816

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free