Conventional pneumoperitoneum compared with abdominal wall lift for laparoscopic cholecystectomy

90Citations
Citations of this article
34Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We have compared, in a randomized study, conventional carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum with abdominal wall lift in 25 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) (11 (SD 2) mm Hg vs 2.7 (9) mm Hg) (P < 0.01) and total amount of carbon dioxide used (40 (23) litre vs 9 (7) litre) (P < 0.001) were significantly less with abdominal wall lift. Pulmonary compliance was significantly greater (P < 0.01) in the abdominal wall lift group throughout operation. During the first 15 min of insufflation, arterial pressures were lower with abdominal wall lift (P < 0.05). In the conventional pneumoperitoneum group, femoral vein pressure increased (P < 0.01) and remained elevated for 3 h in the recovery room. Postoperative drowsiness was of significantly longer duration in the conventional pneumoperitoneum group than in the abdominal wall lift group (98 (46) min vs 13 (34) min) (P < 0.01). Postoperative nausea and vomiting and right shoulder pain occurred more often in patients with conventional pneumoperitoneum (P < 0.05). We conclude that the benefits of abdominal wall lift may be attributed to avoiding excessive carbon dioxide and high IAP.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lindgren, L., Koivusalo, A. M., & Kellokumpu, I. (1995). Conventional pneumoperitoneum compared with abdominal wall lift for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 75(5), 567–572. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/75.5.567

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free