Cost-effectiveness analysis and budgetary impact of antipsychotics available in the Brazilian Unified Health System

  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: To carry out a cost-effectiveness and budget impact analysis of antipsychotic use in adults to treat schizophrenia from the perspective of the Unified Health System (SUS). Methods: A Markov model simulated the treatment of schizophrenic patients with an initial average age of 25 years and a lifetime horizon. The possibility of combining drugs resulted in 20 pharmacotherapeutic strategies. Results: The lowest-cost strategy, risperidone/olanzapine, obtained values of $45,092.77 with effectiveness of 15.97 QALY. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio in dollars/QALY of olanzapine/risperidone was 2,470.24, and risperidone/ziprasidone was 352,671.90, compared to the first option. All other therapeutic combinations were dominated. The budgetary impact assessment indicated that the most cost-effective choice could generate savings of US$ 1,555.00 on average, per patient, over five years. Conclusion: The therapeutic proposal with the lowest cost per patient was risperidone combined with olanzapine, revealing these two drugs as a strategy with lower budgetary impact and better cost-effectiveness.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Manso de Mello Vianna, C., Ribeiro Alves Fernandes, R., … Queiroz Pagnin, V. (2020). Cost-effectiveness analysis and budgetary impact of antipsychotics available in the Brazilian Unified Health System. Jornal Brasileiro de Economia Da Saúde, 12(3), 195–205. https://doi.org/10.21115/jbes.v12.n3.p195-205

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free