Promotion of oral health in nursing—An interprofessional expert standard

9Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: People in need of care or with severe disability have a worse oral health status compared to people without these needs. The increasing number of older people who are able to keep their own teeth requires specific steps to support oral health. Whereas in 1997 1 in 4 people between 65 and 74 years of age was toothless, in 2016 this figure had risen to 1 in 8. Special challenges in oral care arise for older people and people with dementia. The management requires an interprofessional approach. Objective: Interprofessional development of an expert standard for the promotion of oral health by nurses and a focus on older people. Methods: The expert standard is based on a systematic literature analysis. Based on this, members of an interprofessional expert working group consisting of nurses, dentists and a representative of those affected formulated recommendations to promote oral health of people in need of care. Results: The interprofessional approach defines the selection of the guiding questions for the literature search, the evaluation of the literature and the formulation of the recommendations. Interventions to maintain and promote oral health were identified for the guiding questions of the expert standard, for example, in cases of oral fungal diseases, mucositis, gingivitis or accompanying symptoms, such as dry mouth and pain. Discussion: Interventions to promote oral health of people in need of care or with severe disability could be focused more deeply within the nursing profession and formulated by an interprofessional group to guide their actions.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sirsch, E., Ludwig, E., Müller, K., Blumenberg, P., Nitschke, I., & Büscher, A. (2022). Promotion of oral health in nursing—An interprofessional expert standard. Zeitschrift Fur Gerontologie Und Geriatrie, 55(3), 204–209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00391-022-02053-3

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free