Trust and mistrust in shaping adaptation and de-implementation in the context of changing screening guidelines

40Citations
Citations of this article
81Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objective: To understand barriers and facilitators to the adaptation of programs reflecting changing scientific guidelines for breast/cervical cancer screening, including factors influencing the de-implementation of messaging, program components, or screening practices no longer recommended due to new scientific evidence. Design and Methods: We conducted a convergent mixed-methods design in partnership with The National Witness Project (NWP), a nationally implemented evidence-based lay health advisor (LHA) program for breast/cervical cancer screening among African American (AA) women. Surveys were conducted among 201 project directors (PDs) and LHAs representing 14 NWP sites; in-depth interviews were conducted among 14 PDs to provide context to findings. Survey data and qualitative interviews were collected concurrently from January 2019-January 2020. Setting: National sample of NWP sites from across the United States. Results: Trust and mistrust were important themes that arose in quantitative and qualitative data. Common concerns about adapting to new guidelines included: 1) perceptions that new guidelines misalign with the personal values and beliefs of AA women; 2) mistrust of guidelines, providers, medical organizations; 3) confusion about inconsistent guidelines and concern they are based on studies that don’t reflect the experience of AA women (who experience more aggressive tumors at younger ages); and 4) belief that breast self-exam (BSE) is an empowerment tool for AA women and should be included to promote awareness, given many women discovered lumps/cancer through BSE. Conclusion: Findings highlight that trust and mistrust are important but understudied social determinants of health among AAs that should be considered in implementation science as they: 1) have critical implications for shaping health inequities; and 2) help explain and contextualize why new screening guidelines may not be fully embraced in the AA community.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Shelton, R. C., Brotzman, L. E., Johnson, D., & Erwin, D. (2021). Trust and mistrust in shaping adaptation and de-implementation in the context of changing screening guidelines. Ethnicity and Disease, 31(1), 119–132. https://doi.org/10.18865/ED.31.1.119

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free