Counterpoint: Mediation Formulas With Binary Mediators and Outcomes and the "Rare Outcome Assumption"

16Citations
Citations of this article
29Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In their accompanying article, Samoilenko and Lefebvre (Am J Epidemiol. 2019;188(7):1203-1205) correctly note 2 typographical errors in the formulas presented in a 2011 paper on placental abruption by Ananth and VanderWeele (Am J Epidemiol. 2011;174(1):99-108). Fortunately, to the best of our knowledge, researchers are using our methods papers and Dr. VanderWeele's 2015 book on mediation analysis (Explanation in Causal Inference; Oxford University Press, New York, New York), rather than the paper on placental abruption, to carry out their direct and indirect effect analyses; and in ourmethods papers and the book, the formulas are correct. The formulas discussed by Samoilenko and Lefebvre and in our work make reference to a "rare outcome assumption."In evaluating this assumption, it is important to note that the outcome is to be relatively rare across all strata defined by the exposure and themediator-a point that is often neglected.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Van der Weele, T. J., Valeri, L., & Ananth, C. V. (2019). Counterpoint: Mediation Formulas With Binary Mediators and Outcomes and the “Rare Outcome Assumption.” American Journal of Epidemiology, 188(7), 1204–1205. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwy281

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free