FRI0040 Development and validation of clinical predictors for inadequate response to treat-to-target methotrexate therapy in newly diagnosed ra patients

  • Teitsma X
  • Jacobs J
  • Welsing P
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: In new-onset rheumatoid arthritis (RA), therapy should be aimed at achieving sustained remission according to current guidelines, in which methotrexate (MTX) is recommend to be included in the initial treatment strategy. However, a large proportion (~30%) eventually need additional treatment to control inflammation making it necessary to find predictors which helps clinicians in choosing the optimal initial therapy to further improve the long-term outcome of early RA patients. Objective(s): To identify and validate clinical baseline predictors associated with inadequate response (IR) to MTX therapy in disease modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD)-naive early RA patients. Method(s): For identifying clinical predictors, data was used from the U-Act-Early trial of newly diagnosed RA patients treated-to-target with a MTX strategy (n=108, development sample). MTX (oral) was started at 10 mug/week and increased in monthly steps up to 30 mug/week or maximum tolerable dose until remission. If no remission, hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) was added and, if the target, remission, thereafter still was not achieved, HCQ was replaced by tocilizumab. Patients in the tREACH trial who initiated MTX (25 mug/week) in combination with a prednisone tapering scheme were used as validation sample (n=83). In tREACH, if disease activity score (DAS) was >=2.4 after three months, etanercept was added. When three months thereafter the target still was not achieved, patients switched to another tumour necrosis factor alpha inhibitor. In both studies, the definition of IR to MTX, (designated here "MTX+" therapy), was met if patients needed a biological DMARD within the first year. Clinical predictors were identified using logistic regression with backward selection (p adj) 2.1, 95% CI 1.4-3.1; p) 2.1, 95% CI 1.4-3.1; p adj 3.0, 95% CI 1.1- 8.0; p=0.027; and alcohol consumption, OR adj 0.3, 95% CI 0.1-0.9; p=0.021. A risk matrix, categorised by these predictors, shows nearly a twelve and a halve fold risk difference in predicted probabilities (figure 1). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of the model is 0.75 (95% CI 0.66-0.84); no statistically significant difference (p=0.96) was found between the observed and predicted probabilities (i.e. calibration). When using a negative predictive value (NPV), i.e. predicted chance of not failing "MTX+" therapy, of >80% as cut off in the development sample, the positive predictive value (PPV) was 65% (sensitivity: 0.89, specificity: 0.52). The AUROC of the model in the validation sample was 0.67 (95% CI 0.55-0.79) with no significant difference (p=0.28) between observed and predicted probabilities, indicating good calibration. In the validation sample, a cut-off of NPV >80%, the PPV was 54% (sensitivity: 0.88, specificity: 0.38). Conclusion(s): Higher DAS28, current smoking and no alcohol consumption were associated with an increased risk of IR to "MTX+" therapy in newly diagnosed RA patients.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Teitsma, X. M., Jacobs, J. W., Welsing, P. M., de Jong, P. H., Hazes, J. M., Weel, A. E., … Bijlsma, J. W. (2018). FRI0040 Development and validation of clinical predictors for inadequate response to treat-to-target methotrexate therapy in newly diagnosed ra patients. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 77, 567. https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-eular.3463

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free