Testing Stylistic Interventions to Reduce Emotional Impact of Content Moderation Workers

20Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

With the rise in user generated content, there is a greater need for content reviews. While machines and technology play acritical role in content moderation, the need for manual reviews still remains. It is known that such manual reviews could be emotionally challenging. We test the effects of simple interventions like gray scaling and blurring to reduce the emotional impact of such reviews. We demonstrate this by bringing in interventions in a live content review setup thus allowing us to maximize external validity. We use a pre-test post-test experiment design and measure review quality, average handling time and emotional affect using the PANAS scale. We find that simple grayscale transformations can provide an easy to implement and use solution that can significantly change the emotional impact of content reviews. We observe, however, that a full blur intervention can be challenging to reviewers.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Karunakaran, S., & Ramakrishan, R. (2019). Testing Stylistic Interventions to Reduce Emotional Impact of Content Moderation Workers. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Human Computation and Crowdsourcing (Vol. 7, pp. 50–58). Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.1609/hcomp.v7i1.5270

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free