Experimental Validation of Methods for Prophylaxis against Deep Venous Thrombosis: A Review and Proposal

  • Agutter P
  • Malone P
  • Silver I
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The experimental procedure by which the valve cusp hypoxia (VCH) hypothesis of the etiology of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) was confirmed lends itself to testing of methods of prophylaxis. Similar animal experiments could end the present exclusive reliance on statistical analysis of data from large patient cohorts to evaluate prophylactic regimes. The reduction of need for such (usually retrospective) analyses could enable rationally-based clinical trials of prophylactic methods to be conducted more rapidly, and the success of such trials would lead to decreased incidences of DVT-related mortality and morbidity. This paper reviews the VCH hypothesis (“VCH thesis”, following its corroboration) and its implications for understanding DVT and its sequelae, and outlines the experimental protocol for testing prophylactic methods. The advantages and limitations of the protocol are briefly discussed.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Agutter, P. S., Malone, P. C., & Silver, I. A. (2012). Experimental Validation of Methods for Prophylaxis against Deep Venous Thrombosis: A Review and Proposal. Thrombosis, 2012, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/156397

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free