Economic value of intra-articular knee OA therapies: a U.S. perspective

0Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Aims: This study compared the six-month medical/pharmacy costs and healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) for knee OA patients undergoing intra-articular therapy with different classes of hyaluronic acid (HA) (by molecular weight) or corticosteroid (ICS). Materials and methods: Patients across high molecular weight (HMW) HA, medium molecular weight (MMW) HA, low molecular weight (LMW) HA, and ICS therapy groups were matched from a U.S. claims database (Optum’s de-identified Clinformatics Data Mart Database), with a final size of 6,234 patients per group. Adjusted six-month medical/prescription costs per patient per month (PPPM), and HCRU rates and costs, were determined. Secondary endpoints included complication rates and adjusted costs, new prescription analgesic use, and adjunctive/supplemental intra-articular treatment. Results: Mean adjusted PPPM medical costs were highest for LMW HA ($527.14), followed by HMW HA ($469.35) and MMW HA ($441.97) (p

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dasa, V., Ngai, W., Steele, K., Preblick, R., Watson, H., & Ong, K. L. (2025). Economic value of intra-articular knee OA therapies: a U.S. perspective. Journal of Medical Economics, 28(1), 1334–1347. https://doi.org/10.1080/13696998.2025.2549629

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free