Association of Fear of Childbirth with the Preference for Cesarean Section; A Cross Sectional Study

1Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: To determine the fear of childbirth (FOC) amongst pregnant women and its association with preference for cesarean section. Study Design: Cross-sectional study. Place and Duration of Study: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Pak Emirates Military Hospital, Rawalpindi from Jan 2018 to Jun 2018. Methodology: Demographic and reproductive data of the patients including mode of delivery, was noted. The intensity of fear of childbirth was measured by Wijma delivery expectancy/experience questionnaire (W-DEQ), and a score was allotted. The total sum of scoring ranged from 0 to 165. A score of >85-99 indicated an intense fear of childbirth, and ≥100 indicated very intense fear. The frequency of requests for cesarean section in women suffering from fear of childbirth was calculated. Results: A total of 335 patients were included. The mean age was 28.74 ± 3.58 years, and the mean gestational age was 39.50 ± 1.43 weeks. The mean W-DEQ score was 94.59 ± 9.86. The fear of childbirth calculated by W-DEQ in the third trimester of pregnancy showed no fear in 233 (69.55%) participants, intense fear in 42 (12.54%) and very intense fear in 60 (17.91%) women. The requests for cesarean section in women suffering from intense fear were made by 5 (11.90%) women and in women suffering from very intense fear of childbirth was 19 (31.67%) (p-value <0.001). Conclusion: This study concluded that the intensity of fear of childbirth calculated by W-DEQ amongst pregnant women in the third trimester of pregnancy was relatively high, with a much higher rate of cesarean section in very intense fear of childbirth.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ansari, A., & Irum, S. (2022). Association of Fear of Childbirth with the Preference for Cesarean Section; A Cross Sectional Study. Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal, 72(2), 535–538. https://doi.org/10.51253/pafmj.v72i2.5219

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free