To Test or Not To Test?: The Value of Toxicology in a Delayed Overdose Death

10Citations
Citations of this article
33Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

A case demonstrating the necessity of thorough death investigation processes where toxicology plays an active role is presented. A 33-year-old white man presented to the emergency room in respiratory distress after an overdose episode where he was revived on the scene by fire rescue. His condition continued to deteriorate and he expired 6 days after the initial incident. No admission specimens were available for testing; however, there were specimens drawn 4 and 5 days after the incident. Drug paraphernalia from the scene was obtained by the laboratory through collaboration with local law enforcement. Drug paraphernalia was initially tested in the laboratory and after obtaining the results, the antemortem and postmortem specimens were tested identifying mitragynine and U-47700, among other drugs. These results indicate the value in obtaining and testing drug paraphernalia, and the value of testing antemortem specimens even in the event of a delay.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Walsh, E. E., Shoff, E. N., Elizabeth Zaney, M., Hime, G. W., Garavan, F., & Boland, D. M. (2019). To Test or Not To Test?: The Value of Toxicology in a Delayed Overdose Death. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 64(1), 314–317. https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.13822

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free